Skip to main content

Fake pot sales hitting a high

 THE crackdown on synthetic marijuana is a shambles, with no one charged and sales booming.
A proposed tough new law banning the sale of products "intended to have a similar pharmacological effect" to cannabis, lapsed with the change of government.
Police seized about 100kg of suspected synthetic cannabis in statewide raids six months ago but, since then, a Sunday Mail investigation has found that a tobacconist in a southeast Queensland mining town was still selling it until late last month, when police "provided advice".
Although the tobacconist had a separate till to ring up the lucrative product, and it was drawing a queue of mining workers, nothing was seized by attending police. Officers told The Sunday Mail that one tobacconist in another regional mining area was making $1000 a day selling fake cannabis.
Miners had turned to the product because it could not be detected in standard workplace drug testing.
MediNat Australia now have Kronic urine Drug Test trials in place!if you are interested in testing the Kronic K2 urine dip strip please contact us at info@medinat.com.au

Media Release: 

Saliva-only drug tests to greatly increase mine safety risks

Safe Work Australia and the National Mine Safety Framework (NMSF) must abandon proposals that
would impede mining employers from administering the onsite drug and alcohol tests that best suit
their enterprises, resource industry employer group AMMA has said.
With the National Mining Regulations currently being finalised, AMMA has previously raised its
concerns about proposed limitations on drug and alcohol testing procedures under the soon-to-be
harmonised OHS regulations for onshore mining operators.
The regulatory model developed under the auspices of Safe Work Australia and the NMSF would
require majority consent from a workforce before an employer could implement a drug and alcohol
testing system based on anything other than saliva.

Fair Work Australia consents to forced drug tests for building workers

 BUILDING workers will be able to be forced to take drug and alcohol tests following a Fair Work Australia decision that has been described as a "giant leap forward" for the industry.
The full bench decision follows significant tensions in the construction industry over drug and alcohol-affected workers on job sites, with employers arguing they pose a significant safety risk.
Master Builders Association of Victoria executive director Brian Welch said the ruling was a "landmark" decision.
"People who don't say anything about their (drug and alcohol) problem to their union or their employer put their colleagues at risk. We're not moving paper clips here, we're moving heavy machinery and cranes. This is a giant leap forward for the building industry," he said.

CFMEU efforts are out of touch

VICTORIA's Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union is no doubt proud of its reputation as the state's most militant union.
Several of its officials have been charged in recent years over intimidatory behaviour, and it is involved in regular stoushes with developers and big construction companies around Melbourne.
But its latest tactic -- going to court to try to shield workers from drug tests -- shows how out-of-touch with the modern workforce this union really is.
The CFMEU is seeking to strip big builder Thiess of the power to require workers -- many of them CFMEU members -- to undergo drug testing.
Thiess is building the State Government's desalination plant at Wonthaggi and the $2.2 billion M80 Ring Rd Upgrade in Melbourne.
The fact is that most major construction sites in Australia require workers to be drug and alcohol free. This is to protect the workers from injury or death from the dangerous machinery they operate on site. So strict are these laws that workers in some of the remote mine sites in northern Australia have to be careful they don't have one beer too many the night before, in case they return a positive alcohol reading when they front up for work the next day.
Any move to make a workplace safer should be embraced, not resisted.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again."
Post a Comment
Read more

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample and sacked drug-tested sergeant Eamonn Duff  March 12 2017  A single strand of hair that destroyed the life of a long-serving Sydney police officer has the potential to influence the future of not just the entire NSW Police Force but all workplaces across NSW. Sergeant George Zisopoulos insists he has been wrongly dismissed due to one of his hair follicles which returned a positive drug test reading. But while the state's top cop, Commissioner Andrew Scipione, has determined that, on the "balance of probabilities", the officer knowingly consumed drugs, scientific opinion suggests otherwise. Leading forensic experts have cast doubts over the decision to sack Sergeant Zisopoulos, concluding there is "no evidence" the substances found on his hair were ingested and that the minute readings may have been caused by "external contamination". ergeant Zisopoulos, who is the first NSW
Post a Comment
Read more

Welfare drug test: the most likely trial sites based on Govt criteria

Wednesday 17 May 2017 11:00am By James Purtill From next January, anyone applying for Newstart or Youth Allowance in one of three as-yet-unnamed areas could be tested for drug use. Not everyone gets tested. Job seekers and students will be profiled to identify the ones most likely to be taking drugs. We don't know what the profiling will be based on, only that it will be "relevant characteristics that indicate a higher risk of substance abuse". That could be anything from age, to income, to gender to school leaving age. But we do know what criteria the government will use to pick the three trial sites: High rates of welfare; High rates of drug use; Available counselling services. That narrows it down a bit. The three trial sites will test 5,000 *new* applicants, so they need to be Centrelink offices with a lot of people walking through the doors. The office with the highest number of payment recipients in December 2016 (the most recent
Post a Comment
Read more