Skip to main content

Saliva Drug Testing - Awareness Issues

Saliva Drug Testing


Saliva Tests for drugs is the least invasive and fastest way to test for current impairment from drugs in the workplace.

As with any rapid test method including urine drug testing, a Non Negative result needs to be confirmed by a laboratory in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) are the preferred confirmatory methods.

Here are some Questions and Answers regarding issues some have with Saliva Testing:

Q: I had a candidate submit a negative test when the person appears to be under the influence of drugs or something else.

A: There are a number of possible explanations:
      1. I assume the candidate was tested for Alcohol
      2. If the Saliva Test did not have a Benzodiazepine test strip this could be the cause.
      3. There are very few substances or adulterants that can provide a false negative test 
          with saliva.

MediNat will supply authorised  testing personnel, company management or HR with a list of these substances on request, please contact us here.

Q: I had a test that did not show any lines at all, why is that?

A: Saliva Drug Tests require varying amounts of saliva to effectively 'run' the test.
    1. The most common form of sponge stick test requires more saliva than most to 
        successfully run.
    2. Ensure that the sponge is completely soft and saturated with saliva before applying it 
        to the Test unit/cup or cassette.

    3. If the sponge stick has an indicator, make sure the indicator is fully exposed, not just
         a line.
    4. The test strip should have a pinkish flow of saliva that runs all the way to the top, this 
         indicates enough saliva has been applied.
    5. If you have a test that does not run saliva to the top of the strip, add more saliva, 
        either by using using the sponge again, or expressing saliva directly into the cup.

        
Q: I am sure the candidate was under the influence of Synthetic Marijuana, because I 
     heard the gossip onsite. Can I get a saliva test for that?

A:  1. Some Saliva Tests indicate they test Synthetic Cannabis, however the known 
          versions of the chemicals used in this are acids! acid does not cross the barrier well   
          into saliva, therefore there may be as little as 1-2% of the substance in the saliva 
          sample, which is not enough to show a positive.
     2. Saliva tests do detect Synthetic Cannabis in laboratory conditions, because of the 
          quantity of the substance the test is spiked with! this does not translate to the 
         workplace, onsite test. 
     3. If Synthetic Cannabis is suspected, we suggest you use a urine test to potentially 
         detect it because urine tests will detect the metabolite where saliva won't.
      
Note: the majority of tests for K2/Spice or Synthetic Cannabis usually test accurately for
      a few of the known chemicals :

  •        JWH-018 pentanoic acid 50ng/ml
  •        JWH-018 propanoic acid 25ng/ml
  •        JWH-073 butanoic acid 25ng/ml
  •        JWH-210 N-5 carboxypentyl 200ng/ml
  •        JWH-398 N pentanoic acid 200ng/ml
  •        MAM2201 N pentanoic acid 100ng/ml

      While these have always been the most common chemicals, they are not in all 
      Synthetic Cannabis mixtures.
      There are currently 50+ know chemicals found in Synthetic Cannabis.
      However Synthetic Cannabis testing could act as a deterrent for those who think they 
      can use and not be caught, maybe they won't risk it.

 For further information please contact us at MediNat Australia

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again."

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample and sacked drug-tested sergeant Eamonn Duff  March 12 2017  A single strand of hair that destroyed the life of a long-serving Sydney police officer has the potential to influence the future of not just the entire NSW Police Force but all workplaces across NSW. Sergeant George Zisopoulos insists he has been wrongly dismissed due to one of his hair follicles which returned a positive drug test reading. But while the state's top cop, Commissioner Andrew Scipione, has determined that, on the "balance of probabilities", the officer knowingly consumed drugs, scientific opinion suggests otherwise. Leading forensic experts have cast doubts over the decision to sack Sergeant Zisopoulos, concluding there is "no evidence" the substances found on his hair were ingested and that the minute readings may have been caused by "external contamination". ergeant Zisopoulos, who is the first NSW

Welfare drug test: the most likely trial sites based on Govt criteria

Wednesday 17 May 2017 11:00am By James Purtill From next January, anyone applying for Newstart or Youth Allowance in one of three as-yet-unnamed areas could be tested for drug use. Not everyone gets tested. Job seekers and students will be profiled to identify the ones most likely to be taking drugs. We don't know what the profiling will be based on, only that it will be "relevant characteristics that indicate a higher risk of substance abuse". That could be anything from age, to income, to gender to school leaving age. But we do know what criteria the government will use to pick the three trial sites: High rates of welfare; High rates of drug use; Available counselling services. That narrows it down a bit. The three trial sites will test 5,000 *new* applicants, so they need to be Centrelink offices with a lot of people walking through the doors. The office with the highest number of payment recipients in December 2016 (the most recent