Skip to main content

Drug Driving Advice On Australian Roads

Hazy Drug Driving Advice On Australian Roads

 |  By

Very interesting article by Eoin Blackwell as follows:

If you’re a little dazed and confused about Random Drug Testing on Australia's roadsides, it’s probably not just because of what you’re smoking.
RDTs are being rolled out across the country at an increasing rate, with as many as 200,000 drivers to be tested in Victoria and 100,000 in NSW by 2017.
Prompted by a recent NSW court case, where a Lismore man was acquitted after being pinged nine days after having cannabis, The Huffington Post Australia decided to investigate the state of play in each state.
Cannabis is, after all, the most widely cultivated, trafficked and abused illicit drug, and accounts for almost half of all drug seizures worldwide, while 34.8 percent of Australians aged 14 years and over have used it one or more times in their life, 10.2 percent using it in the 12 months to 2014.
But state governments in Australia, perhaps reflecting their territories' approach to illegal drugs in general, give different advice to drivers about just how long the psychoactive component of marijuana, THC, can be detected by a roadside test - ranging from zero tolerance, general guidelines over how long it takes to become undetectable, to no advice at all.

Please read the article full here

MediNat comments:

  1. Our understanding is that Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol  (THC)  metabolises to Hydroxy-Δ9-THC (also detectable in Saliva) then to Carboxy THC which is detectable in urine.
  2. All manufacturers indicate detection times for THC in saliva, however they are taken with some caution by those of us who distribute the products, because the manufacturers detection times are usually determined in laboratory conditions with perfectly spiked samples of saliva being tested (hardly real life)
  3. All devices have a lower detection limit from which the device cut off is determined, i.e. a cut off of 25ng/ml is determined when more than 50% of devices detect THC at that level, often this can mean for 98%-99% accuracy means the tests will read positive at 25ng/ml + up to 50% above that cutoff. Note: some are less, some are more than that.
  4. There is insufficient research done to determine 'impairment' from THC or any other illicit substance, this research is critical for workplace drug testing as well as roadside testing.
  5. In terms of detection limits it seems Tasmania may have the right language!
  6. In our estimation, the average saliva drug test gives a detection window of 4hrs-6hrs after that it becomes a grey area, some devices detecting THC at 12 hrs (10ng/ml cutoff) some up to 18-24 hrs (electronic with 5ng/ml cutoffs) All of this depends on the quality and quantity of substance consumed, plus a myriad of personal factors.
  7. Our advice, don't drug and drive......


MediNat Australia is a supplier of premium drug detection devices to workplaces, medical centres and individuals.

Comments

  1. Great Blog !
    The New South Wales Government has announced a clinical trial of the medical use of Cannabis Australia

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again."

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample and sacked drug-tested sergeant Eamonn Duff  March 12 2017  A single strand of hair that destroyed the life of a long-serving Sydney police officer has the potential to influence the future of not just the entire NSW Police Force but all workplaces across NSW. Sergeant George Zisopoulos insists he has been wrongly dismissed due to one of his hair follicles which returned a positive drug test reading. But while the state's top cop, Commissioner Andrew Scipione, has determined that, on the "balance of probabilities", the officer knowingly consumed drugs, scientific opinion suggests otherwise. Leading forensic experts have cast doubts over the decision to sack Sergeant Zisopoulos, concluding there is "no evidence" the substances found on his hair were ingested and that the minute readings may have been caused by "external contamination". ergeant Zisopoulos, who is the first NSW

Welfare drug test: the most likely trial sites based on Govt criteria

Wednesday 17 May 2017 11:00am By James Purtill From next January, anyone applying for Newstart or Youth Allowance in one of three as-yet-unnamed areas could be tested for drug use. Not everyone gets tested. Job seekers and students will be profiled to identify the ones most likely to be taking drugs. We don't know what the profiling will be based on, only that it will be "relevant characteristics that indicate a higher risk of substance abuse". That could be anything from age, to income, to gender to school leaving age. But we do know what criteria the government will use to pick the three trial sites: High rates of welfare; High rates of drug use; Available counselling services. That narrows it down a bit. The three trial sites will test 5,000 *new* applicants, so they need to be Centrelink offices with a lot of people walking through the doors. The office with the highest number of payment recipients in December 2016 (the most recent