Skip to main content

What are Australian Standards Requirements 'REALLY'

Australian Standards for Urine and Saliva Drug Tests


I thought it was about time to clear this one up, as there is just so much misinformation around the internet about Australian Standards compliance and those organisations that try to create the idea that they are the only company that create an Australian Standards drug test and all others are all making false claims and are somehow in breach of the ACCC Fair Trading Act.

Lets get the facts!

Australian Standards cut-off levels for Urine tests (copied straight from the Australian Standards):



ASNZS 4308-2008
TABLE 1
IMMUNOASSAY SCREENING TEST CUT-OFF LEVELS
Class of drug* Cut-off level, μg/L

Amphetamine type substances                                 300
Benzodiazepines                                                      200
Cannabis metabolites                                                 50
Cocaine metabolites                                                 300
Opiates                                                                     300

* For drugs that may be optionally tested within each class, the specified cut-off levels may not apply and other methodologies may be more appropriate.


This is very clear and defines 'exact cut-off levels' that testing units need to comply with!
Don't be fooled when someone says they are compliant but they have cut-off levels of 1000μg/L - 3000μg/L, you could be work tested or incident tested with an Australian Standards test many hours later and be positive!

Australian Standards cut-off levels for Saliva tests (copied straight from the Australian Standards):


AS4760 - 2006

TABLE 3.1
ON-SITE INITIAL TEST TARGET CONCENTRATIONS
Class of drug Target concentration ng/mL

Opiates                                                                        50
Amphetamine-type stimulants                                    50
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)                                 25
Cocaine and metabolites                                             50
NOTE: These targets represent the undiluted oral fluid concentration.


As you can see above this standard suggests 'TARGET' concentrations!! not exact cut-offs as does the urine standard.
It is important that units meet or are as close as possible to the target concentration.
Last I saw the Victorian Police drug testing unit did not test THC (marijuana) at the standard level, however it is clear that the standard requires the unit to be targeted to the 25ng cut-off

Some organisations state that you should see the NATA certificate of compliance!
However the Australian Standards state that:

"NOTE: Collecting agencies making a statement of compliance with this Australian Standard,
are advised to ensure that such compliance is capable of being verified

Don't be fooled by bold statements of compliance with products that clearly do not meet the standards or the standards targets in the case of saliva tests.
Also do not be persuaded by seemingly qualified and convincing statements about breach of ACCC regulations where the facts are somewhat distorted!

My advice! make sure drug test kits clearly meet the required cut-offs in the case of Urine Tests and are targeted to the required concentrations in the case of saliva tests.

see our range at medinat.com.au and be confident that we are compliant with the requirements of the standards.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again." ...

Make sure you’ve got a Drug Testing Policy in place

Drug testing employees? Make sure you’ve got a policy in place John Salter / Thursday, April 6, 2017 SmartCompany You suspect one of your staff members is regularly turning up to work affected by their drug intake. Or there’s been an incident at work, and an investigation has uncovered that the staff member involved was impaired by alcohol at the time. What do you do? For many SMEs, their initial reaction will be to discipline and perhaps dismiss the employee. But before you go ahead and make any rash decisions, you need to understand exactly where you stand legally if you want to minimise the chance that an unfair dismissal or other relevant claim is brought against you. The case of the Sydney ferry driver One of the most notorious unfair dismissal cases in Australia involving drug and alcohol use was that of a Sydney ferry captain who tested positive to cannabis in 2013, after being called in to work on a day off to cover an unexpected absen...