As many are aware accuracy of Saliva Drug Testing and the detection of THC is frequently questioned.
There is substantial research in the last 15 years that indicates that Saliva Drug Testing for THC is quite unstable, even with monumental advances in technology in recent years it still remains so.
The emphasis is on detection of the Parent Drug at 50ng as that is deposited in the mouth via when marijuana is smoked.
It is quite obvious that the amount of this molecule deposited in the mouth is entirely dependent on the 'quality' and 'quantity' of the substance consumed.
I am of the firm belief that the quality/potency is a major issue with detection in saliva.
For example if marijuana leaf is consumed in comparison to the head that has a high density of trichome, (sticky resin). With these two there is no comparison, if you ran a saliva test after someone smoked leaf it is possible to get a negative, if they smoked high density head laden with trichome it should be detected for Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol(THC) in saliva.
The issue = Potency - not all weed smoked has high potency, one could be 15% while another 65%, this will give very different results with a saliva test.
From a user perspective the weaker the Δ-9 THC content the more delayed the real high, because the high is dependent on the metabolite molecules, THC-COOH, this takes longer to enter the blood stream and is easily detected with a urine drug test.
As a matter of interest the highest potency molecule is 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC, detected in urine not saliva.
The end result for saliva testing is quite variable!
But it does remain a great deterrent for onsite testing
There is substantial research in the last 15 years that indicates that Saliva Drug Testing for THC is quite unstable, even with monumental advances in technology in recent years it still remains so.
I don't want to create a "how to buy good marijuana article" however some practical facts need to be covered as well as the technical information.
Below is a typical product insert for a saliva
test device showing the types of THC molecules tested. This tests detects both
the Parent THC and the metabolite THC-COOH
Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (Parent)
|
50 ng/mL
|
(-)-11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-COOH
|
12 ng/mL
|
11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC
|
300 ng/mL
|
11-nor-Δ8-THC-9-COOH
|
12 ng/mL
|
The emphasis is on detection of the Parent Drug at 50ng as that is deposited in the mouth via when marijuana is smoked.
It is quite obvious that the amount of this molecule deposited in the mouth is entirely dependent on the 'quality' and 'quantity' of the substance consumed.
I am of the firm belief that the quality/potency is a major issue with detection in saliva.
For example if marijuana leaf is consumed in comparison to the head that has a high density of trichome, (sticky resin). With these two there is no comparison, if you ran a saliva test after someone smoked leaf it is possible to get a negative, if they smoked high density head laden with trichome it should be detected for Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol(THC) in saliva.
The issue = Potency - not all weed smoked has high potency, one could be 15% while another 65%, this will give very different results with a saliva test.
From a user perspective the weaker the Δ-9 THC content the more delayed the real high, because the high is dependent on the metabolite molecules, THC-COOH, this takes longer to enter the blood stream and is easily detected with a urine drug test.
As a matter of interest the highest potency molecule is 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC, detected in urine not saliva.
The end result for saliva testing is quite variable!
But it does remain a great deterrent for onsite testing
Here is the technical information for those who want to know the details:
Rapid Saliva Drug Tests are a qualitative assays which indicates a
"YES / NO" response to the presence or absence of drugs in the sample,
giving a "Presumptive Negative"
or "Presumptive Positive/Non Negative" result.
A saliva drug test for THC, whether in combination with other
drugs to be assessed or standalone test, detects THC present in a sample in the
form of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol or Δ9-THC (parent drug), (-)-11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-COOH (metabolite), 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC (the main metabolite) or 11-nor-Δ8-THC-9-COOH
(metabolite) Δ9-THC is the molecule or active ingredient of
cannabis that can be found specifically in the mouth. The smoke of a marijuana contains
a large amount of this molecule. The smoke will contaminate the oral cavity
during smoking, and it leaves a trail for several hours.
If the saliva sample has a THC level above the indicated cut-off of the
device e.g. 50ng/ml, the test will indicate a presumptive positive, otherwise
the test will be presumptive negative.
Detection time of THC in saliva : whatever the test used,
THC (the active ingredient in cannabis) can rarely be detected more than 4 to 12
hours in saliva. The detection time of many Saliva tests will therefore be 4 to
12 hours after the last smoke, although some say much longer, to do so would
require an extremely low detection level for THC say <10ng/ml
What is the difference between
Δ9-THC and THC-COOH?
Δ9-THC, it
is the correct abbreviated term used for the cannabis molecule in its raw or
parent state.
THC-COOH (also called
11-nor-Δ9-THC-COOH or 11-nor-Δ8-THC-9-COOH) is the molecule of cannabis that has been converted by the body (the
"metabolite" of cannabis).
The human body must indeed change the Δ9-THC in order to eliminate it. 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-THC which is rarely found in
the mouth other than when cannabis is orally consumed, not smoked, crosses the
blood/brain barrier very fast after processing by the liver, it subsequently
produces 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC
which has some analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect. The result of this transformation is essentially
THC-COOH, found particularly in
large quantities in the urine as it is excreted from the body.
How to choose the right saliva test?
Because the predominant molecule present in
the mouth after smoking is the Δ9-THC, with minor quantities of THC-COOH which
has already been metabolised. Be aware that many saliva tests on the market are
still designed to detect only THC-COOH at low cut-offs and a few will detect Δ9-THC
at high quantities as well as THC-COOH. The tests that only tests THC-COOH are much
less effective. The cut-offs are usually indicated as 12ng/ml for THC-COOH,
this sometimes equates to 50ng/ml for Δ9-THC but not always, it depends on the
strip manufacturer and reagents used in the test strip. Tests that target the molecule of Δ9-THC can
achieve better and more accurate results for marijuana use, and the lower the
cut-off, the more effective the test will be.
Always review the product information or ask
the supplier to determine if their saliva test targets Δ9-THC, or THC-COOH.
To choose a good saliva
test for THC, it is important to understand that
a test that targets the Δ9-THC at 25 ng/ml – 50ng/ml (most common) will be much
more effective than a test that targets THC-COOH at 12 ng/ml . Although the
second shows a detection limit lower than the first. The reason being there is
a very small percentage of THC-COOH present and that is only after it has metabolised.
Many devices detect both however with an emphasis on THC-COOH therefore
the test may not give a result for some time after consumption e.g. 2+ hrs
after use, when there is a higher concentration of the THC-COOH.
Can a saliva test replace a urine test?
No, because these two types of tests do not
answer to the same question.
Can a urine test check if a saliva test is working?
Only after a period of time, once the THC has
fully metabolised and processed.
A urine test can be used to confirm the presence
of THC in a candidate after a period of time has elapsed but not with a very
short timeframe after use.
Saliva tests enables a screening on a very short detection
period for THC. They are designed to tell if someone has recently used a THC
(within a few hours), but not whether the person has a history of THC use over
the last 10 - 30 days.
They answer the question: Has this person smoked marijuana during the
last 4-8 hrs and used other tested substances in the last 24-48 hrs
It must be noted that saliva testing for THC is notoriously complex and
detection periods in any single individual cannot be easily determined.
In fact substantial research in the field indicated that it is
impossible to define test times for THC. This is due to a multitude of
variables both in the individual and in the quality of the THC consumed.
Individual characteristics such as age, sex, body weight, fat tissue
(THC stores in fat), metabolism, and history of use all have a bearing on the
possible results.
Of course, the quality of the marijuana is also critical in the process,
low quality, low THC molecules will not produce the same results as high
quality marijuana with high THC concentrations.
So the concept that I just smoked a joint or cone and then tested myself
and it is negative has little bearing on the validation of the device.
In field testing with the best devices in the World had very low success
with this method of test validation.
Note:
Any drug testing is not all about test results, testing, especially
random testing is one of the best deterrents to working under the influence of
drugs.
Because of the versatility and environmental requirements to use saliva
tests, they are by far the most effective in deterring drug use.
Comments
Post a Comment