Skip to main content

Make sure you’ve got a Drug Testing Policy in place

Drug testing employees? Make sure you’ve got a policy in place

John Salter / Thursday, April 6, 2017 SmartCompany

You suspect one of your staff members is regularly turning up to work affected by their drug intake. Or there’s been an incident at work, and an investigation has uncovered that the staff member involved was impaired by alcohol at the time. What do you do?
For many SMEs, their initial reaction will be to discipline and perhaps dismiss the employee. But before you go ahead and make any rash decisions, you need to understand exactly where you stand legally if you want to minimise the chance that an unfair dismissal or other relevant claim is brought against you.

The case of the Sydney ferry driver

One of the most notorious unfair dismissal cases in Australia involving drug and alcohol use was that of a Sydney ferry captain who tested positive to cannabis in 2013, after being called in to work on a day off to cover an unexpected absence. After initially being dismissed by Harbour City Ferries based on its zero-tolerance policy, in April 2014 a Fair Work Commission (FWC) decision ordered that he be reinstated, primarily on the basis that there was no evidence that he was impaired to perform his work at the time of the incident.
Unsurprisingly, Harbour City Ferries appealed that decision and in April 2015, the full bench of the Fair Work Commission overturned the reinstatement decision, bolstering the employer’s rights to enforce internal zero-tolerance policies, and indicating that the core issue was the disobedience by a senior employee of a well-known and important company policy.

What does this mean for employers?

Essentially, Harbour City Ferries zero tolerance drug and alcohol policy, and its ability to prove it had been well communicated to all staff, came up trumps. It was regarded as of more general importance than any other consideration, including the rights of the ferry captain.
So, if you need to deal with a drug or alcohol issue in your workplace, before you do anything else make sure you:
  • • Have a specific policy in place that states clear parameters for your tolerance levels (such as zero-tolerance, or a number of warnings prior to dismissal). If you do not have a policy in place, you should not shoot from the hip and instantly sack an employee on the assumption that they are impaired for work;
  • • Understand the laws specific to your state about drug and alcohol testing, and the implications for staff who refuse to be tested;
  • • Check that your policy states: how and when will tests be carried out; what the consequences are for positive tests or a breach of the policy (for example, what are grounds for transfer demotion or dismissal, and how many warnings will be given before discipline is imposed?); and details of any employee assistance programs you have in place to support staff, or at minimum, be prepared to have a list of services to which you can refer them for help;
  • • Have communicated the policy to all staff, and can provide evidence of these communications; and
  • • Refer to the policy in all employment contracts, including the consequences for employees when the policy is breached. This is particularly important if you want to enforce a ‘zero tolerance’ policy.
If you don’t have a formal policy in place, you may find yourself limited in how you can discipline staff who test positive for drugs and alcohol.
However, developing and implementing a detailed and comprehensive policy and a drug and alcohol testing program may not be practical for all SMEs. In this case, develop a very simple policy that allows you to request that, in circumstances where repeated absence or noticeable impairment while at work has arisen, employees must provide evidence of their fitness to work from their own doctor.
If you’d like some more guidance on how to develop your own drug and alcohol policy, state-based work safety organisations have resources available online, as does Safework Australia.
MediNat Australia supply workplace Drug Testing Devices which are either Certified Australian Standards compliant or manufactured to Australian Standards Thresholds.
Check out this resource for creating a workplace drug and alcohol testing policy it is a great guide Safework Australia
For discount Drug Tests or at home drug testing please visit Drug Test Medinat

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Methamphetamine use and addiction in Australia

methamphetamine use and addiction in Australia By Nicole Lee Associate Professor at the National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction at Flinders University More commonly known by the street names speed, ice or crystal meth, both amphetamine and methamphetamine belong to a group of stimulant drugs called amphetamines. Australia has one of the highest rates of illicit methamphetamine use in the world and the highest use among English-speaking countries. Around 2.5% of Australians over 14 years – around half a million people – have used methamphetamine in the last year. This rate is three- to five-times higher than the USA, Canada (0.5%) or the UK (1%). Illicit use The illegal manufacture of street amphetamines in Australia is almost exclusively methamphetamine. Illicit methamphetamine is manufactured in local “meth labs” and also imported from South-East Asia. The drug usually comes in powder or pills (speed) o...
Post a Comment
Read more

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample and sacked drug-tested sergeant Eamonn Duff  March 12 2017  A single strand of hair that destroyed the life of a long-serving Sydney police officer has the potential to influence the future of not just the entire NSW Police Force but all workplaces across NSW. Sergeant George Zisopoulos insists he has been wrongly dismissed due to one of his hair follicles which returned a positive drug test reading. But while the state's top cop, Commissioner Andrew Scipione, has determined that, on the "balance of probabilities", the officer knowingly consumed drugs, scientific opinion suggests otherwise. Leading forensic experts have cast doubts over the decision to sack Sergeant Zisopoulos, concluding there is "no evidence" the substances found on his hair were ingested and that the minute readings may have been caused by "external contamination". ergeant Zisopoulos, who is the first NSW...
Post a Comment
Read more

Workers dodge positive drugs tests - My Thoughts

Workers dodge positive drugs tests 26 March, 2013 Vicky Validakis Mining Australia The Article (see below for comments) Industry drug testers have raised concerns that workers are managing their illegal drug intake in a bid to escape getting caught out in tests. Kerryanne Tawhai, director of Down to Earth results, a company that tests illegal substances in resource industry workers, expressed concern that workers were managing their drug intake to avoid testing positive to drugs, including amphetamines. The comments come after Queensland Police in Gladstone raided a suspected methamphetamine laboratory in West Gladstone on Friday. "(It) goes with the territory," she said. "You've got large a congregation of people and there's nothing really to do in this town." She said most people know that these type of drugs left the body in a short-time, enabling users to adjust their usage before they go back to work on mine sites. ...
2 comments
Read more