Skip to main content

Influx of deadly synthetic drugs sets off alarm bells

Influx of deadly synthetic drugs sets off alarm bells

Rory Callinan, Investigative journalist, The Age


Academics and law enforcement officers have expressed growing alarm about the tide of synthetic drugs that have claimed five lives, including three students, in 14 months.
Amid a proliferation of drugs designed by sophisticated overseas laboratories to mimic LSD, cannabis and methamphetamines, one academic forecasts worse is to come.

Law officials also point out the difficulties in outlawing the drugs when laboratories regularly change the chemical composition to avoid bans.
The acting chief executive of the Australian Crime Commission, Paul Jevtovic, says: ''The reality is we can't keep up. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction has found that, since 2011, we are seeing a new drug in this category every week.''

Governments, including Victoria's, have been trying to outlaw the trade by banning any substance designed to mimic the effects of illicit drugs.

Legislation before Parliament would ban a wide range of substances designed to mimic the effects of ecstasy, LSD, cocaine and cannabis.
In December, the Victorian government also banned sale of the synthetic cannabinoid Marley after five people were taken to hospital after using it.

At the time health experts repeated concerns about legislative efforts that focus on the chemical composition of the synthetic drugs. This followed the death of five people in Australia in the past 14 months blamed on synthetic drugs.

The NSW drug squad head, Detective Superintendent Nick Bingham,says strategies are working, citing figures from Newcastle, where callouts to psychotic episodes fell from nearly 30 a month to just two after a particularly potent drug was banned.

But authorities admit drugs are constantly being developed to get around the legislation.
The drugs are usually made in legal laboratories in China, with Guangdong a hub where chemists are asked to ''tweak'' or change the chemical structure to get around bans.

Judicial authorities say the laws have yet to be tested in higher courts, with several cases to be tried this year. The risks posed by new drugs are flagged by an emergency medicine doctor and synthetic drug researcher, David Caldicott.

''It has been a wild, unrestrained evolution that kind of came out of left field,'' Dr Caldicott says.
''I get concerned because the rate of change is so fast that something big and ugly is just around the corner.
''Purely banning material, people always find a way around it. We need to be more clever and nimble.''
Comment:

A good balanced view of the issues faced.
The answers are nos tso easy for our society to face.

If companies are not testing for K2 Spice as well as other drugs they are facing serious safety issues for these undetected substances.

MediNat Australia supplies a large range of devices for the detection of drugs, including K2 Spice in many of its variations.

Graham
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again." ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are Australian Standards Requirements 'REALLY'

Australian Standards for Urine and Saliva Drug Tests I thought it was about time to clear this one up, as there is just so much misinformation around the internet about Australian Standards compliance and those organisations that try to create the idea that they are the only company that create an Australian Standards drug test and all others are all making false claims and are somehow in breach of the ACCC Fair Trading Act. Lets get the facts! Australian Standards cut-off levels for Urine tests (copied straight from the Australian Standards): ASNZS 4308-2008 TABLE 1 IMMUNOASSAY SCREENING TEST CUT-OFF LEVELS Class of drug* Cut-off level, μg/L Amphetamine type substances                                 300 Benzodiazepines               ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Make sure you’ve got a Drug Testing Policy in place

Drug testing employees? Make sure you’ve got a policy in place John Salter / Thursday, April 6, 2017 SmartCompany You suspect one of your staff members is regularly turning up to work affected by their drug intake. Or there’s been an incident at work, and an investigation has uncovered that the staff member involved was impaired by alcohol at the time. What do you do? For many SMEs, their initial reaction will be to discipline and perhaps dismiss the employee. But before you go ahead and make any rash decisions, you need to understand exactly where you stand legally if you want to minimise the chance that an unfair dismissal or other relevant claim is brought against you. The case of the Sydney ferry driver One of the most notorious unfair dismissal cases in Australia involving drug and alcohol use was that of a Sydney ferry captain who tested positive to cannabis in 2013, after being called in to work on a day off to cover an unexpected absen...
Post a Comment
Read more