Skip to main content

Union to mount challenge against drug tests for miners

By Babs McHugh ABC Rural

Miners preference Saliva Drug Tests over Urine Drug Tests

A union plans to mount a legal challenge against urine testing for drugs on mine sites.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union has called it intrusive and degrading and wants urine tests replaced with saliva tests.
Secretary of the West Australian branch, Steve McCartney, says saliva tests are used by police and the judiciary and should be implemented on mine sites.
"Now we've got the technology that proves saliva testing works, why would we have our members subjected the indignity of having to do a urine test?" he said.
"Not only a urine test, but a urine test in company (of others) or under camera surveillance.
"So there's an issue for our members that's there somebody from the company standing around while you're urinating in front of them, while there's a test that proves the same fitness for work by simply putting a stick in your mouth and checking your saliva.
"Why should they be subjected to it?"
Saliva tests pick up readings of drugs that are currently in the system, while urine tests can give readings on drugs that have been used some time previously.
"My understanding is the saliva tests meet an Australian industry standard and it's supported by the West Australian police and criminal courts as a legitimate test for readiness to either drive a vehicle, or, in this case, work on the job," Mr McCartney said.
"We believe there's a lot of other things they could be concentrating on around workplace safety to save more lives than trying to make our members expose their genitals and urinate in a cup, when there's a test that can do the same thing."
Read the full article here

 MediNat Australia supplies the Mining and Gas Industry with both Urine and Saliva Drug Testing Kits for mpreliminary onsite screening.

MediNat is soon to release a new range of urine drug test cups for onsite tests.
Including K2 + 6 Drugs and 6 Adulterants, also a new larger cup coming soon!

We also supply some of the most reliable and accurate Saliva drug tests available

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Methamphetamine use and addiction in Australia

methamphetamine use and addiction in Australia By Nicole Lee Associate Professor at the National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction at Flinders University More commonly known by the street names speed, ice or crystal meth, both amphetamine and methamphetamine belong to a group of stimulant drugs called amphetamines. Australia has one of the highest rates of illicit methamphetamine use in the world and the highest use among English-speaking countries. Around 2.5% of Australians over 14 years – around half a million people – have used methamphetamine in the last year. This rate is three- to five-times higher than the USA, Canada (0.5%) or the UK (1%). Illicit use The illegal manufacture of street amphetamines in Australia is almost exclusively methamphetamine. Illicit methamphetamine is manufactured in local “meth labs” and also imported from South-East Asia. The drug usually comes in powder or pills (speed) o...

What are Australian Standards Requirements 'REALLY'

Australian Standards for Urine and Saliva Drug Tests I thought it was about time to clear this one up, as there is just so much misinformation around the internet about Australian Standards compliance and those organisations that try to create the idea that they are the only company that create an Australian Standards drug test and all others are all making false claims and are somehow in breach of the ACCC Fair Trading Act. Lets get the facts! Australian Standards cut-off levels for Urine tests (copied straight from the Australian Standards): ASNZS 4308-2008 TABLE 1 IMMUNOASSAY SCREENING TEST CUT-OFF LEVELS Class of drug* Cut-off level, μg/L Amphetamine type substances                                 300 Benzodiazepines               ...

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample

NSW Police overlooked scientific advice about hair sample and sacked drug-tested sergeant Eamonn Duff  March 12 2017  A single strand of hair that destroyed the life of a long-serving Sydney police officer has the potential to influence the future of not just the entire NSW Police Force but all workplaces across NSW. Sergeant George Zisopoulos insists he has been wrongly dismissed due to one of his hair follicles which returned a positive drug test reading. But while the state's top cop, Commissioner Andrew Scipione, has determined that, on the "balance of probabilities", the officer knowingly consumed drugs, scientific opinion suggests otherwise. Leading forensic experts have cast doubts over the decision to sack Sergeant Zisopoulos, concluding there is "no evidence" the substances found on his hair were ingested and that the minute readings may have been caused by "external contamination". ergeant Zisopoulos, who is the first NSW...