Skip to main content

Union to mount challenge against drug tests for miners

By Babs McHugh ABC Rural

Miners preference Saliva Drug Tests over Urine Drug Tests

A union plans to mount a legal challenge against urine testing for drugs on mine sites.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union has called it intrusive and degrading and wants urine tests replaced with saliva tests.
Secretary of the West Australian branch, Steve McCartney, says saliva tests are used by police and the judiciary and should be implemented on mine sites.
"Now we've got the technology that proves saliva testing works, why would we have our members subjected the indignity of having to do a urine test?" he said.
"Not only a urine test, but a urine test in company (of others) or under camera surveillance.
"So there's an issue for our members that's there somebody from the company standing around while you're urinating in front of them, while there's a test that proves the same fitness for work by simply putting a stick in your mouth and checking your saliva.
"Why should they be subjected to it?"
Saliva tests pick up readings of drugs that are currently in the system, while urine tests can give readings on drugs that have been used some time previously.
"My understanding is the saliva tests meet an Australian industry standard and it's supported by the West Australian police and criminal courts as a legitimate test for readiness to either drive a vehicle, or, in this case, work on the job," Mr McCartney said.
"We believe there's a lot of other things they could be concentrating on around workplace safety to save more lives than trying to make our members expose their genitals and urinate in a cup, when there's a test that can do the same thing."
Read the full article here

 MediNat Australia supplies the Mining and Gas Industry with both Urine and Saliva Drug Testing Kits for mpreliminary onsite screening.

MediNat is soon to release a new range of urine drug test cups for onsite tests.
Including K2 + 6 Drugs and 6 Adulterants, also a new larger cup coming soon!

We also supply some of the most reliable and accurate Saliva drug tests available

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GHB date rape drug is back and pill testing may not help, says ED doctor

GHB the Date Rape Drug Discovered by a Russian chemist in the nineteenth century, used as a general anaesthetic in 1970s Dunedin, picked up by Californian bodybuilders in the 1990s - the drug known as GHB has travelled a long road to its current resurgence in the Australian party scene. On the weekend in Melbourne, more than 20 people were hospitalised after reportedly overdosing at the Electric Parade festival. GHB was blamed - one of the biggest overdoses of the drug since 10 people collapsed outside at a Gold Coast nightclub in 1996. "It's back again," exclaimed Dr David Caldicott, a Canberra-based emergency department doctor who was in Adelaide when GHB hit in the '90s. "I thought we managed to explain to people it was a stupid drug to take. Around Australia there will be emergency doctors everywhere holding their heads in their hands going, 'Oh God!'. "A new generation has started learning the mistakes all over again." ...

What are Australian Standards Requirements 'REALLY'

Australian Standards for Urine and Saliva Drug Tests I thought it was about time to clear this one up, as there is just so much misinformation around the internet about Australian Standards compliance and those organisations that try to create the idea that they are the only company that create an Australian Standards drug test and all others are all making false claims and are somehow in breach of the ACCC Fair Trading Act. Lets get the facts! Australian Standards cut-off levels for Urine tests (copied straight from the Australian Standards): ASNZS 4308-2008 TABLE 1 IMMUNOASSAY SCREENING TEST CUT-OFF LEVELS Class of drug* Cut-off level, μg/L Amphetamine type substances                                 300 Benzodiazepines               ...

Make sure you’ve got a Drug Testing Policy in place

Drug testing employees? Make sure you’ve got a policy in place John Salter / Thursday, April 6, 2017 SmartCompany You suspect one of your staff members is regularly turning up to work affected by their drug intake. Or there’s been an incident at work, and an investigation has uncovered that the staff member involved was impaired by alcohol at the time. What do you do? For many SMEs, their initial reaction will be to discipline and perhaps dismiss the employee. But before you go ahead and make any rash decisions, you need to understand exactly where you stand legally if you want to minimise the chance that an unfair dismissal or other relevant claim is brought against you. The case of the Sydney ferry driver One of the most notorious unfair dismissal cases in Australia involving drug and alcohol use was that of a Sydney ferry captain who tested positive to cannabis in 2013, after being called in to work on a day off to cover an unexpected absen...