Fast Fact
Alcohol and other drugs cost Australian workplaces
an estimated $6bn per year in lost productivity. Recent research has estimated that
2.5 million days are lost annually due to alcohol and other drug use.
Persons Conducting Business or Undertaking (PCBUs)
have an onerous duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health
and safety of workers and others in their workplace under WHS laws. This
includes the provision of a safe work environment, information, instruction,
training and supervision in relation to WHS that extends to being under the
influence of drugs or alcohol at work. Workers also have an obligation under
WHS laws to protect their own health safety and that of others in the
workplace. As such, showing up to work under the influence may be a breach by
the worker of their WHS obligations as it is of the PCBU that failed to prevent
it.
It is also considered "serious
misconduct" justifying summary termination of employment for the purpose
of the Fair Work Act and associated Regulation to show up to work
"intoxicated". A worker is considered to be "intoxicated"
if his or her faculties are so impaired that they cannot be entrusted with
their usual duties.
- In this context, what are 'reasonably practicable steps' to protect the health and safety of workers?
A drug and alcohol policy should generally be
introduced to regulate, if not eliminate, the use of drugs and alcohol in the
workplace. This policy should be based on a risk assessment considering the
risks associated with drugs and alcohol in the particular workplace that it
relates to. This assessment will dictate what testing, if any, is reasonable
and necessary in the circumstances.
- Are there any issues employers must be aware of when drafting this?
Whilst organisations, courts and industrial
tribunals seem to accept D&A testing is generally an intrusion into an
individual's private life that blurs the boundaries between home and work, it
is accepted as the lesser evil if testing is necessary to ensure the health and
safety of workers and others in the workplace. Clearly, this threshold issue
depends on the nature of the workplace and the level of influence that poses a
risk such that it should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
- What's the current situation in regards to drug testing in the workplace?
It was established the Fair Work Commission Full
Bench in the case of Briggs v AWH Pty Ltd (2013) that a refusal of an
employee to undergo D&A testing in circumstances where the employee's
employment contract referred to and required compliance with the D&A policy
was a refusal to obey by a lawful and reasonable direction justifying
termination of employment. It is therefore important to assess the risks
associated with drug and alcohol use in the workplace, document a policy that
seeks to eliminate those risks, require compliance with the policy and
procedure as a term of the employment agreement and consistently enforce
non-compliance.
The content of this article is intended to provide
a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about
your specific circumstances.
Comments
Post a Comment